Defense Verdicts
- No
cause defense verdict in damages-only wrongful death trial. Wrongful death trial in 2005 in
Middlesex County. One-car accident resulted in death of our client's passenger, a 48-year-old man. Liability was
stipulated. 29-year-old daughter of the decedent sued our client. Since the
decedent's wife died from a medical condition
two months before his automobile death, the 29-year-old plaintiff lost
both her parents in a span of two months. Green v. Bittner economic
damages and future wage losses in excess of $800,000 went on the board with
plaintiff's
economic expert. No defense economic experts were called.
The jury rejected the entire amount of the Estate's alleged economic losses, returning a verdict of “no damages.” There was no
appeal. Defense attorney: Steve Rudolph.
- No
cause defense verdict on liability in wrongful death trial. Wrongful death trial in 2006 in Ocean
County. 38-year-old plaintiff/decedent was electrocuted at
work. Decedent was survived by his wife and three young
children. Decedent's estate sued his employer under the Laidlow worker's compensation “intentional wrong”
exception to the worker's compensation bar. Our client
was a manufacturer of high voltage electronic equipment.
Jury heard about our client's OSHA violations and
subsequent remedial measures. Green v. Bittner economic damages and future
wage losses went on the board with plaintiff's economic expert.
No defense liability or medical experts were called. The jury returned a
defense verdict on liability, determining that our client's conduct was not “substantially certain” to cause
death or serious injury to their employee. There was no
appeal. Defense attorney: Steve Rudolph.
- No
cause defense verdict on proximate cause in brain damage trial. Damages-only automobile
negligence trial in 2006 in Morris County. After the accident,
female plaintiff in her 30's diagnosed with Chiari Malformation, a
brain disorder. Plaintiff underwent “Chiari” brain surgery, which
required the complete surgical removal of the C1 vertebrae and the complete
removal of a three-inch
circular section of the back of plaintiff's skull. Four different
neurosurgeons for plaintiff testified that the accident aggravated her
preexisting brain condition and the brain surgery was
medically necessary and causally related to the accident. No defense
medical experts were called. The jury returned a defense verdict,
determining that plaintiff's
brain condition and her brain surgery was not related to the automobile accident. There was no appeal. Defense attorney: Steve
Rudolph.
- No
cause defense verdict on liability in brain damage trial. Slip and fall trial in 2005 in Mercer
County. Plaintiff slipped on a puddle of liquid in bathroom at work and
struck the back of her head as she hit the floor. Brain damage from Chiari Malformation brain
condition. Brain damage worsened to the point that the female plaintiff in
her 40's was in a wheelchair during trial. Plaintiff was
permanently disabled and receiving Social Security disability
benefits. Our client was a large commercial property owner who owned this
property.
Plaintiff alleged brain condition and need for brain surgery was caused
by the head trauma. No defense liability or medical experts were
called. The jury returned a defense verdict on liability, determining that
our client's conduct was not
negligent. Plaintiff's new trial and additur motions were
denied. There was no further appeal. Defense attorney:
Steve Rudolph.
- No
cause defense verdict on liability in tractor-trailer accident.
Tractor-trailer accident trial in 2003 in
Atlantic County. During a snowstorm, our client drove his tractor-trailer into the rear of a
small car that was stopped at a light, injuring the driver and passenger.
Plaintiff's car was totaled. One plaintiff, age 23, had lumbar and shoulder surgeries and the other plaintiff,
age 22, had cervical and knee surgeries.
Our client testified that he was driving
reasonably but could not stop his tractor-trailer because of the snow
and ice. His tractor-trailer slid into the rear of the stopped car. No defense liability or medical experts were
called. Our client was an employee of a large tire manufacturer. The jury
returned a defense verdict on liability, determining that our
client did not drive his tractor-trailer negligently. Plaintiff's new trial motion was denied. There was no further
appeal. Defense attorney: Steve Rudolph.
- No
cause defense verdict on liability in brain damage trial. Motor vehicle/pedestrian accident trial in
2007 in Middlesex County. Male plaintiff, age 45, was walking across Route 18
when he was struck by our client, who was driving an SUV. Plaintiff
was walking in the crosswalk and he claimed he had the green light at the time of the accident.
Our client claimed he had the green light and plaintiff darted out into
traffic against the light. Plaintiff was thrown
55 feet through the air and sustained massive head injuries.
Plaintiff was in a coma for 35 days and sustained more than 10 skull
fractures, bilateral orbital fractures and fractures at C6, C7, and
T1. Plaintiff had complete vision loss in his left eye and 20
post-accident seizures. In the hospital, plaintiff was read his
“Last Rights.” Plaintiff's expert testified that plaintiff will
never be able to live independently and will need constant medical
attention for the rest of his life. No defense medical experts
were called. The jury returned a defense verdict on liability, determining
that our client did not drive his car negligently. There was no appeal.
Defense attorney: Steve
Rudolph.
- No
cause defense verdict on proximate cause with lumbar fusion surgery. Damages-only
uninsured motorist (UM) trial in 2008 in Monmouth County.
27-year-old female plaintiff was rear-ended by an uninsured
driver. Liability
stipulated. Plaintiff has "zero" threshold.
Plaintiff taken to the ER with low back complaints.
Plaintiff eventually had lumbar fusion surgery with cages and
hardware. Plaintiff had no prior accidents or low back
injuries. Plaintiff used two orthopedic experts who
testified that plaintiff's low back fusion was caused by the
accident and was permanent. The defense called no
medical experts. The jury returned
a defense verdict, determining that none of plaintiff's injuries
or surgeries were related to the motor vehicle
accident. There was no appeal. Defense
attorney: Steve Rudolph.
- No cause defense
verdict on
proximate cause with two lumbar surgeries. Rear-end hit.
Liability stipulated. Damages-only automobile negligence
trial in 2004 in Monmouth County. Female plaintiff in her 20's
with a speech impediment had two lumbar surgeries, the second a fusion
surgery with cages. Plaintiff married with two infant children.
Plaintiff's car totaled in the
accident. Defense used a neuroradiologist to dispute MRI
findings. The jury returned a defense verdict, determining that
plaintiff's injuries were
not related to the motor vehicle accident. Plaintiff's new trial
and additur motions were denied. There was no further
appeal. Defense attorney: Steve Rudolph.
- No
cause defense verdict on proximate cause with cervical and lumbar fusion
surgeries. Damages-only automobile
negligence trial in Middlesex County in 2003. Rear-end hit. Liability
stipulated. Male
plaintiff in his 30's underwent cervical fusion surgery and lumbar
fusion surgery. Plaintiff totally disabled as a result of the accident and receiving Social
Security disability. Plaintiff unable to return to work. Plaintiff's
economic expert put more than $800,000 in economic losses on
the board. Defense used a neuroradiologist to dispute
the MRI findings. The jury returned a defense verdict,
determining that plaintiff's injuries and surgeries were not related to the motor vehicle accident.
Plaintiff's new trial and additur motions were denied. There was
no further appeal. Defense attorney: Steve Rudolph.
- $60,000
(total) wrongful death verdict for four survivors. Wrongful death
trial in 2003 in Monmouth County. One-car accident where plaintiff/decedent was a
passenger in our client's car. Our client was cited for DWI and served
three years in prison for vehicular homicide. Plaintiff/decedent, a
21-year-old female, was a
full-time college student majoring in Religion at the time of her death.
Plaintiff/decedent was survived by her father and three younger siblings, all of whom were on the
verdict sheet as beneficiaries of her Estate. Plaintiff/decedent's mother
had died at age 34 from cancer when the plaintiff/decedent was
only 9 years old. Plaintiff's economic expert
testified about Green v. Bittner economic damages, loss of future
earnings and other pecuniary losses in excess of $1 million. No
defense economic or medical experts were called. The jury awarded
each sibling $20,000 and "no damages" to the decedent's father.
There was no appeal. Defense attorney: Steve
Rudolph.
- No
cause defense verdict on proximate cause in lumbar fusion, knee surgery and
psychiatric admission. Damages-only automobile
negligence trial in 2003 in Middlesex County. Rear-end hit.
Liability stipulated. Plaintiff's car was totaled. Female plaintiff had two lumbar
surgeries, including a two-level fusion, two knee surgeries, and a
psychiatric admission. Plaintiff's experts related all of these findings
to the automobile accident and said they were permanent.
Defense used a neuroradiologist to dispute MRI findings.
The jury returned a defense verdict, determining that none of plaintiff's injuries
or surgeries were related to
the motor vehicle accident. Plaintiff's new trial and additur
motions were denied. There was no further appeal. Defense
attorney: Steve Rudolph.
- No
cause defense verdict on liability when pot of boiling water dumped on
4-year-old girl. General negligence trial in 2007 in Monmouth
County. Our client dumped a large pot of boiling spaghetti water on 4-year-old
girl's shoulder, neck, chest and arm. Accident occurred in the
kitchen as our client was carrying the pot of boiling water to
the sink to dump in the strainer. Our client became startled by
the small girl's sudden appearance in the kitchen and dumped the
scalding water on the girl's neck, shoulder, arm and chest. Plaintiff's
experts testified that the extremely large residual scars and burns
on the shoulder, arm and chest were permanent. Revision surgery,
grafting and future medical costs exceeding
$100,000 went on the board. No defense medical experts were
called. The jury retuned a defense verdict on liability, determining that
our client's conduct was not negligent. Plaintiff's new
trial motion was denied. On appeal, the Appellate
Division affirmed the no cause defense verdict. Defense attorney:
Steve Rudolph.
- No
cause defense verdict on proximate cause in brain damage UIM trial. Damages-only
underinsured motorist (UIM) trial in
2005 in Burlington County. Male plaintiff recovers $100,000 from
tortfeasor in underlying case. Head-on automobile collision
results in plaintiff's head striking and breaking the windshield, causing skull
fractures.
Both vehicles were totaled. Plaintiff's experts testified about
plaintiff's skull fractures, brain injury,
closed head injury, cognitive deficits and complete loss of his real estate
business. $500,000 in wage losses was presented. As a UIM
trial, the jury did not know about plaintiff's prior settlement of
$100,000 or the fact that the true defendant was an insurance
company. Defense used no defense medical experts. The jury returned
a defense verdict, determining that plaintiff's brain
injuries, closed head injuries, cognitive deficits and loss wages
were not related to the motor vehicle accident. There was no
appeal. Defense attorney: Steve Rudolph.
- $10,000
verdict for seven facial scars on 3-year-old girl. Damages-only
dog bite trial in 2005 in Monmouth County. Female/plaintiff was 18 months
old when she was bit by a dog and dragged for a short
distance. The girl was 3 years old at the time of
trial. 70 stitches were needed to close 7 facial
wounds and the young girl subsequently developed a neurological lip
droop from the nerve damage. Future revision surgery and future
medical costs went on the board. Plaintiff's medical expert testified that
all 7 scars and the lip droop were permanent. Since our client owned the dog, we had
full liability under New Jersey's strict liability dog bite statute. No defense medical
experts were called. The jury returned a $10,000 verdict.
Plaintiff's new trial and additur motions were denied. There was
no further appeal. Defense attorney: Steve Rudolph.
- "DiProspero"
no cause defense verdict on proximate cause. After the N.J. Supreme
Court decided DiProspero v. Penn in 2005, thus eliminating the
"serious impact" prong under the verbal threshold, the DiProspero case was remanded back to
the Camden County trial court. Ms. DiProspero, who was 21 years old at the
time of her automobile accident,
had a damages-only trial in 2006 in Camden County. Liability was
stipulated. Our client caused the accident. Ms. DiProspero's medical
experts all testified that plaintiff sustained nine permanent disc bulges,
permanent nerve damage and a permanent TMJ injury. Ms. DiProspero had no
prior injuries or accidents. No defense
medical experts were called. The jury returned a defense verdict,
determining that none of Ms. DiPropsero's injuries were
related to the automobile accident. Plaintiff’s new trial and
additur motions were
denied. There was no further appeal. Defense attorney:
Steve Rudolph.
- $5,000
verdict for two facial scars on 14-year-old boy. Damages-only dog
bite trial in 2006 in Monmouth County. Male plaintiff was 14 years old
when he was bit on
the face by a dog. 75 stitches were used to close the facial
wounds. Future revision surgery and future medical costs went on the
board. Plaintiff's medical expert testified that the
scars were permanent. Since our client owned the dog, we had full liability
under New Jersey's strict liability dog bite statute. No defense medical experts were
called. The jury returned a $5,000 verdict. Plaintiff's new
trial and additur motions were denied. Plaintiff appealed to the Appellate
Division. The Appellate Division entered a $20,000 additur. Defense attorney: Steve Rudolph.
- No
cause defense verdict on liability in products liability trial.
Products liability trial
in 2008 in Camden County. Plaintiff, a heating and air conditioning (HVAC)
technician, sustained severe burns while attempting to
troubleshoot/repair a residential air conditioning unit.
When the AC unit would not start, plaintiff hooked up a
"hard start" product to the AC unit to provide
increased starting torque. When the circuit breaker was
turned back on, the compressor portion of the AC unit exploded
and sent flames and hot oil directly at plaintiff.
Plaintiff sustained first, second and third degree burns on
26% of his body, including his legs, arms, chest and
face. Plaintiff spent 8 days in the Temple University
Burn Unit. Plaintiff brought a "defective
warnings" claim against the manufacturer under the
Product Liability Act, alleging that there were no warnings
that this type of explosion could occur. We argued that
the warnings that were on the product were adequate to convey
the dangers of the product, and that plaintiff was a
sophisticated user of the product who did not need the type of
warnings plaintiff was alleging were necessary.
Plaintiff called two engineering experts, who opined the
product was defective because there were no warnings about
explosions or flames. Plaintiff's burn expert opined the
burn residuals are permanent. The defense called no
liability or medical experts. The jury
returned a defense verdict on liability, determining that the
warnings on the product were adequate. There was no appeal.
Defense attorney: Steve
Rudolph.
- No
cause defense verdict on liability in construction/engineering trial. Construction/professional engineering trial
in 2003 in Ocean County. A Title 59 sewerage authority sued our client, a professional engineering firm, to recover over $700,000 in
damages from our client's alleged incorrect and/or insufficient
blueprints and construction drawings for an underground sewerage system
in a new development. Trial involved engineering experts, construction
experts, architect experts and sewerage experts. The jury
returned a defense verdict on liability, determining that our
client was not
negligent and did not deviate from accepted engineering
standards. There was no appeal. Defense attorney: Steve
Rudolph.
- No cause defense
verdict on
proximate cause with cervical and lumbar fusion surgeries. Damages-only automobile negligence
trial in 2007 in Ocean County. Rear-end hit. Liability
stipulated. Plaintiff had the "zero"
threshold. Female plaintiff in her 30's has two-level lumbar
fusion surgery, two-level cervical fusion surgery, revision cervical
fusion surgery (after screws break), and more than 20 epidural
injections. Plaintiff totally disabled and receiving Social
Security disability. No defense medical experts were
called. The jury retuned a defense verdict, determining that none of
plaintiff's injuries or surgeries were related to the motor vehicle accident. Defense attorney: Steve
Rudolph.
- No
cause defense verdict on liability in brain damage case. Pedestrian/MVA trial in 2004 in Ocean
County. Male plaintiff was walking across Route 9 when he was struck
by a vehicle operated by our client. Plaintiff struck our client's windshield and was tossed to the roadway about 50 feet from the point
of impact. Plaintiff sustained numerous fractures, head injuries,
collapsed lung, and a torn meniscus of the knee. He was in the
hospital for 12 days. Plaintiff's experts said the head injury, brain
damage and knee injuries were permanent. The defense
called no medical experts. The jury returned a defense
verdict, determining that our client was not driving
negligently. Plaintiff's new trial motion was denied. There
was no further appeal. Defense attorney: Steve Rudolph.
- No
cause defense verdict on proximate cause with lumbar fusion surgery. Damages-only
underinsured motorist (UIM) trial in
2006 in Monmouth County. Male plaintiff recovers $15,000 from
tortfeasor in underlying case. Rear-end hit. Liability
stipulated. Plaintiff has "zero" threshold. Plaintiff
has lumbar fusion surgery for herniated discs and has
recommendation for cervical fusion due to herniations. Plaintiff also had
recommendation for shoulder surgery for rotator cuff tear. As a
UIM trial, the jury did not know about plaintiff's prior settlement of
$15,000 or the fact that the true defendant was an insurance
company. Defense used a neuroradiologist to dispute the MRI findings. The jury returned
a defense verdict, determining that none of plaintiff's injuries
or surgeries were related to the motor vehicle
accident. Plaintiff's new trial and additur motions were
denied. In a reported decision, the Appellate Division affirmed the no
cause defense verdict (Bardis v. First Trenton Indemnity,
397 N.J. Super. 138 (App. Div. 2007). Defense
attorney: Steve Rudolph.
- $63,750
net verdict; pedestrian/MVA; bilateral tibia/fibula fractures.
Pedestrian/MVA trial in 2008 in Monmouth County. Female plaintiff/pedestrian
was walking across an intersection in the designated crosswalk
when she was struck by our client, who was driving a red
BMW. Our client was making a left-hand turn and
testified he never saw plaintiff before the impact. Our
client admitted plaintiff was in the crosswalk when he struck
her. After being struck by the vehicle, plaintiff lost
consciousness and sustained a concussion. She also
sustained comminuted, displaced fractures of the left tibia
and fibula, right tibia and fibula, as well as a fractured
pelvis. Plaintiff had open reduction internal fixation
surgery with rods and screws for the tibia/fibula
fractures. Plaintiff was totally disabled and was unable
to walk without a cane. She also had residual headaches
from the concussion/closed head injury. Plaintiff's medical expert testified that
all of the leg fractures and ambulation difficulties were permanent.
We argued that our client was not negligent, despite the New
Jersey pedestrian/automobile statute that provides drivers
must yield the right-of-way to pedestrians in the
crosswalk. The jury returned a liability verdict of 51%
on our client and 49% on plaintiff. The gross damages
verdict was $125,000, which was reduced to a net award of
$63,750 due to plaintiff's 49% comparative negligence.
Plaintiff has filed a new
trial and additur motion. We cross-moved for fees and costs under
the Offer of Judgment Rule, as we filed an Offer of Judgment
for $200,000. Both motions are pending. Defense attorney: Steve
Rudolph.
- No
cause defense verdict on liability in lack-of-security trial. Premises/security trial in
Somerset County in 2007. Female plaintiff knocked down
in a movie theater by an allegedly large and unruly
crowd. Plaintiff was about to hand her movie tickets to
the ticket taker when she was pushed violently from behind by
one or more patrons attempting to rush past the ticket
taker. Plaintiff fell forward and fractured her right
arm in two places and allegedly tore her rotator cuff.
Our client was the movie theater and we denied that the
theater was negligent. Plaintiff's security expert
testified that the theater had no security officers inside the
theater to provide security or enforce crowd control
measures. Plaintiff's security expert also testified
that plaintiff's accident was foreseeable and caused by the
theater's negligence. Plaintiff's orthopedic expert
testified that plaintiff's two arm fractures and torn rotator
cuff were caused by the falldown accident at the
theater. The defense called no liability experts,
arguing instead that it is impossible for the theater to
prevent spontaneous and unexpected acts by its patrons.
The jury returned a defense verdict for the theater,
determining that our client was not negligent.
Plaintiff's new trial motion was denied. There was no
further appeal. Defense attorney:
Steve Rudolph.
- No cause defense verdict on damages-only verbal
threshold. Damages-only automobile negligence trial in
2008 in Gloucester County. Our client, an employee of a
commercial publishing company, drove his truck at 40 m.p.h.
into the rear of plaintiff's stopped car. Plaintiff's
car was pushed into the opposite lanes of traffic and drove up
an embankment. Both vehicles were totaled.
Liability was stipulated. Plaintiff alleged three
herniated discs in her neck and two herniations in her low
back. MRIs confirmed all five herniations.
Plaintiff's medical experts testified that the herniations
were causally related to the accident and were
permanent. Defense argued that all the herniations were
degenerative and preexisting and the defense used a
neuroradiologist to dispute the MRI findings. The jury
returned a defense verdict, determining that none of
plaintiff's injuries were permanent under the AICRA verbal
threshold statute. Defense attorney: Steve
Rudolph.
**
DISCLAIMER ** These are examples of defense jury verdicts in other
cases. Results on current or future cases can vary greatly and
the end result depends on many unknown variables.
As a result, similar defense verdicts are not and cannot be guaranteed.
|